Slew of random questions

[zOrP]

2 questions....

When a req is reqfilled, doesn't nxtools kick users from the req folder..?

cause i just reqfilled a folder, but it didnt rename..

and second, when i do site new some weeks old folders come out

but when i do site new section its the right ones..

ideas?

[neoxed]

Originally Posted by zOrP

When a req is reqfilled, doesn't nxtools kick users from the req folder..?

cause i just reqfilled a folder, but it didnt rename..

ioFTPD's Tcl interface for kicking online users returns before they are kicked, so nxTools uses some ugly hacks to work around this. Unfortunately, my work-around doesn't work 100% of the time - this needs to be fixed in ioFTPD.

Originally Posted by zOrP

and second, when i do site new some weeks old folders come out

but when i do site new section its the right ones..

If you ran "SITE REBUILD" to rebuild the dupe databases, it's likely that some directories had incorrect timestamps.

[zOrP]

oki, first is ioftpd prob.. doesnt matter then..

second..
i did site rebuild..

but after that
every time i make a new folder, if i do site new mp3, its correct.

but site new is wrong.. still only the ones from site rebuild.
not adding new ones...

[neoxed]

It's probably because the creation time on some directories is incorrect, and "SITE REBUILD" uses that time.

New entries will be added, but because the timestamp on other entries are wrong (in the future), new entries won't be shown.

[zOrP]

true..

i checked creation time..
copied the folders and voila..

its working now..

[zOrP]

another thing about request then..

(16:32:39) (@xxx) !reqfill 7
(16:32:42) (@xxx) -site/REQFiLLED- > Filled request test.req-thingy for user1/group.
(16:32:43) (@xxx) -site/REQFILLED- > test.req-thingy (ID #7) filled by user2/group after 21m 39s

Possible to minimize this, and only have the last line, and not the line from nxtools ?

[neoxed]

The first message is the user notification (also informs user about errors) and the latter is the channel announcement.

Typically the user notification is sent by private message/notice, I don't know why you have it set for the channel. Personally, I wouldn't disable either one.

[zOrP]

ahh.. oki.

Thought the target=channel was for the req announce..
So ill make it notice then..

about reqwipe.

here is my conf.
set req(MaximumAge) 14
set req(ReleaseNames) True
set req(RequestPath) "C:/REQUESTS"
set req(RequestTag) {REQ-%(request)}
set req(FilledTag) {_FiLLED/FILLED-%(request)}

here is debug

06-06-2006 01:24:34 -------------------------------------------------------------------
06-06-2006 01:24:34 - Script : ..\scripts\nxTools\nxRequest.tcl
06-06-2006 01:24:34 - args : WIPE
06-06-2006 01:24:34 - user : user
06-06-2006 01:24:34 - group : group
06-06-2006 01:24:34 - groups : group
06-06-2006 01:24:34 - flags : 1MTHL
06-06-2006 01:24:34 - path : C:\REQUESTS\_FiLLED
06-06-2006 01:24:34 - pwd : /REQUESTS/_FiLLED/

But reqs older than 14 days are not wiped.
some are old reqs from using ioA.
but still same header. Others are new.
but also not wiped.
any idea?

[neoxed]

Because they're from ioA...nxTools only wipes requests marked as filled in the database (data\requests.db).

[zOrP]

ahh.. oki..
nice enough..
thnx for the quick replies.

[zOrP]

btw..
For that announce nxtools part..

(16:48:50) (@xxx) !approve Some.test-rls
(16:48:51) (@xxx) -site/APPROVE- > Some.test-rls was approved by xxx/CREW
(16:48:52) (@xxx) -site/APPROVE-ADD- > Found the release, approved "/TEST/Some.test-rls".

i changed alcobot.conf to
# Module: nxTools
channel.approve = flags=o target=notice
but it still spams instead of notice..
the same with reqs..

And now i got ur attention..

If both ioa and nxtools modules are loaded its quite a mess.
I use ioa for search, and nxtools for everything else.
if i load nxtools first, req dont work, and if i load ioa first
the cookies are messed up.
%(id) and %(age) isn't working

[neoxed]

As I've said many times, the ioA and nxTools module cannot co-exist. If you want to load both of them, you'll have to edit the .tcl files to play nicely.

If you look at variables.txt for the ioA module, you'll see it doesn't have the %(id) and %(age) cookies.

[zOrP]

yup.. I saw..
too bad for ioa then..