ioFTPD General New releases, comments, questions regarding the latest version of ioFTPD. |
06-02-2007, 10:59 AM
|
#76
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8
|
ioGui2.exe
Thanks for the great updates Yil! ioFTPD is almost perfect now in my eyes.
Last edited by sweetsour; 06-02-2007 at 01:23 PM.
|
|
|
06-03-2007, 02:14 PM
|
#77
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 110
|
got crash log with 6.1.4
ioftpd 6.1.4 has been random crashed then got this log:
Code:
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0042e9cf (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0xec00000c
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0042e9cf (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0xec00000c
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0041abe3 (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0x322e6873
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0042e9cf (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0xec00000c
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0040269f (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0xe801ac99
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0040269f (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0xe801ac99
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0040269f (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0x9801ac99
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0040269f (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0xa001ac99
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0040269f (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0xa001ac99
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0040269f (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0xa001ac99
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0040269f (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0xa001ac99
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0040269f (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0xa001ac99
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x7c9796d0 (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0x00000014
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x7c9796d0 (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0x00000014
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0042fe8f (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0x0c01f004
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x76e61e13 (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0xe800162d
|
|
|
06-04-2007, 04:37 AM
|
#78
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 543
|
Just a question from my side. The source that is in the forum now is that 6.1.0.4 or is it still 6.1.0.0??
|
|
|
06-05-2007, 02:51 PM
|
#79
|
Too much time...
FlashFXP Beta Tester ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,194
|
FTP: it's 6.1.0.0 although the number of lines that differ between that and the current release is probably like 10 tops as I only fixed the few bugs listed in the ChangeLog and all were simple.
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 10:56 PM
|
#80
|
Member
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Foundation User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
|
i am unsure if this is a ioFTPD or ioSFV setting but if i upload something it makes Incomplete symlinks like normal but i can only enter them with the user that uploaded the file. any other user and it says this.
but if u try the same thing with the user that uploaded it, it will work as normal!
----------------------------------------------------
ioFTPD 6.1.4 ioSFV Version 2.0beta1.56
Last edited by Zer0Racer; 06-08-2007 at 03:28 AM.
Reason: no release names
|
|
|
06-08-2007, 09:00 PM
|
#81
|
Member
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Foundation User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
|
zerorace what are u talking about no release names. their is release names and the sym links work fine if the user that uploads the stuff clicks on them. its when other users use them when the links do not work. i trying to find out if its a setting that i set wrong, but to do that i have to know what the setting is and if its a setting in ioSFV or ioFTPD, but thanks anyway for trying to help!!!
i noticed this crash but not sure when and why it happened.
Unhandled exception 3221225477 at address 0x0043ef68 (0x00000000)
0x00000000 0x00000000
running as system service
----------------------------------------------------
ioFTPD 6.1.4 ioSFV Version 2.0beta1.56
Last edited by PSA9; 06-08-2007 at 09:05 PM.
|
|
|
06-09-2007, 01:55 AM
|
#82
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 703
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSA9
zerorace what are u talking about no release names. their is release names and the sym links work fine if the user that uploads the stuff clicks on them.
[...]
|
Actually, I didn't help you with anything. Just told you that you shouldn't post release names here.
/ZR
|
|
|
06-09-2007, 12:30 PM
|
#83
|
Junior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4
|
I just upgraded to the latest ioFTPD and I'm having a problem with the serviceinstaller.exe
I had ioFTPD as a service before but using the command line program (the one that came in service.zip with the tools to make a certificate) and so I used that to uninstall the service.
When I try to install the service with this new program, I get an error. It says it can't find the EXE when it's in the same directory as it. Its looking in my C:\Documents and Settings\User directory for ioFTPD.exe.
How do I fix this?
Also maybe in future releases the Idle_Exempt could be changed to include flags instead of just username and group. Flags would make it much easier; you just give the person exempt a special flag instead of adding their name to the config and rehashing.
Last edited by ESP; 06-09-2007 at 12:42 PM.
|
|
|
06-09-2007, 03:03 PM
|
#84
|
Member
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Foundation User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
|
Sorry Zer0Racer, i have much respect for u, tuff, Yil and others!!!
i misunderstood
Quote:
Last edited by Zer0Racer : Yesterday at 08:28 AM. Reason: no release names
|
as thinkin u were saying that the reason the sym links were not working was due to no release names, sorry for the confusion! I HOPE THAT SOMEONE CAN HELP ME THOUGH.
|
|
|
06-11-2007, 09:56 PM
|
#85
|
Too much time...
FlashFXP Beta Tester ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,194
|
ESP: I made Idle_Exempt a regular permission string (note the use of -'s before individual users and not just their names). Thus you can exclude specific users such as I did, but nothing is stopping you from something like "Idle_Exempt = I" and then giving users the I flag to make them exempt... That would solve your rehash problem.
PSA9: Symlink issue...
#1) Do the symlinks work correctly after a server restart?
#2) What zipscript is creating the symlinks? ioSFV?
#3) If you manually create a symlink via the site command does it work correctly for all users?
I don't understand why it would work for the creating user, but not the others. Might be a permission issue or something on the directory being pointed at so double check that. Turn the release name into XYZ, but send the error message other users are seeing again as it got edited out...
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 02:03 PM
|
#87
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 277
|
Yil, just so you can rule out a permissions issue with symlinks and ioSFV, ioSFV doesnt modify the perms of the incomplete parent symlinks, although this doesnt mean that it could be io messing it up
__________________
#iotools #ioftpd (both on efnet)
|
|
|
06-14-2007, 11:22 AM
|
#88
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8
|
CPSV + Global_Outbound_Bandwidth
Hi!
I wanted to limit my upload speed today, but as soon as I did, outgoing CPSV FXP stopped working.
Here's what I get:
x CPSV
227 Entering Passive Mode ()
x RETR hello.rar
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for hello.rar.
426 Connection closed: Overlapped I/O operation is in progress.
Then I tried Client_Outbound_Bandwidth instead of global, doesn't help. Scheduler_Update_Speed = HIGH # Socket scheduler update speed
# (HIGH/NORMAL/LOW/DISABLED)
Tried the lower values, those don't help either. It only worked after I set it to DISABLED, but that means no bandwidth control at all obviously.
|
|
|
06-14-2007, 11:39 AM
|
#89
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8
|
/ at the end of path
Also, what's your opinion concerning the last '/' character of the full path?
(for instance the last character of /blah/upload/)
The other FTPd programs don't put '/' at the end, and some clients use that for some functions.
Any chance of removing it?
|
|
|
06-19-2007, 10:02 AM
|
#90
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Scripter ioFTPD Foundation User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 132
|
[MINOR BUG] SECTION-arg not being passed on (needs confirmation)
I totally forgot about this issue of mine earlier, but I'm not sure this actually is a bug, need someone to confirm this.
I've got an 'echoall' batch-file (see below) set to be executed OnUploadComplete but the SECTION is always reported as blank, even tho' the STATSSECTION is reported as the correct one. Am I using the wrong argument to check the section or?
Code:
@echo off
set
echo arg1 = %1
echo arg2 = %2
echo arg3 = %3
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.
|