_panic_: weekly status: comments

[aktizol]

didn't speak for _panic_ in personal..

-> but for the situation which is circulated for months now.

am i wrong or am i missing something?

[EwarWoo]

You're not wrong no, but your timing is.
Nows the time to welcome panic on board and encourage his onward march to completion, not drag him down by dwelling on things that he can't change cos they're past.

[aktizol]

hope that we will finally see a new version soon ;-)

[_panic_]

Originally Posted by godlike

I hardly wait to get that ioFTPD 1.0 .... in summer 2020 .... this is getting redicilous ... i hope u noticed that.

/me looks around

omg! the product is late! when the fsck did that happen!

it's like one minute things were going fine and *bam* we're behind schedule. i'm glad you were the *first person to notice* or we might never have realized what was going on!

seriously, after hearing the *same* whine 100 times it just really isn't that informative any longer. i think i'll start a new top-level thread called "*****ing about ioftpd 1.0 release date" and declare complaining about the schedule off topic except in that thread.

[SnypeTEST]

that'd be sweet.

[_panic_]

Originally Posted by SnypeTEST

that'd be sweet.

yeah, i agree. flame on!

[pion]

An idea - what about a public todo list?

I'm sure it's to long already, but we all have our little ideas on what we want we find wrong, and features we're missing..

So personally I would love to see what to expect in the future!

[_panic_]

Originally Posted by pion

An idea - what about a public todo list?

I'm sure it's to long already, but we all have our little ideas on what we want we find wrong, and features we're missing..

So personally I would love to see what to expect in the future!

i'd rather, instead of a public todo list, have a public wiki. i think it would work with the forums to condense information that becomes spread across multiple threads into a single place for dealing with issues and tasks.

i've *just* started an internal wiki for ioftpd... it isn't very good yet, but i'm putting more in there as i come across it.

[_panic_]

i've written a new status report. comments encouraged.

[helenoksen]

whoot VS2005 ownz0rz! I use it myself for developing webapps. It has lots of cool new features.. it's def. going to help you being more productive!

cheers and keep up the good work !

[JoC]

Have the weekly updates turned into monthly?

[PNC]

Originally Posted by JoC

Have the weekly updates turned into monthly?

lol... maybe you're right.. due I havent seen any updates...
Have to wait till something new come up..

[_panic_]

i've written a new status report. comments encouraged.

[Harm]

It would be interesting to be able to use this regression testing framework for our scripts too. It's so easy to break one feature while adding/fixing another one.

I can't see any problem with it running on linux, except that some of the users who will want to run the tests may not own a linux box. What are the tools you've used to develop it? There are win32 ports of many *nix tools nowadays.

[_panic_]

Originally Posted by Harm

It would be interesting to be able to use this regression testing framework for our scripts too. It's so easy to break one feature while adding/fixing another one.

I can't see any problem with it running on linux, except that some of the users who will want to run the tests may not own a linux box. What are the tools you've used to develop it? There are win32 ports of many *nix tools nowadays.

while i'm not literally using ucspi-tcp, i'm using a program that is basically identical. particularly, i'm using a helper application to set up the ip connection, both client and server. further, the test framework is written in perl.

i think because of the architecture (fork+fd sharing) we'd have to use something like cygwin to get it running on on windows.