General Discussion Need help? Have a problem? Let us help you. Bug reports and feature requests should be made using the Bug Tracker or Feature Tracker |
05-06-2019, 10:26 PM
|
#2
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 6
|
Charles requested I post this
While I can't give specifics, I would like to point out that no sexual assault occurred. Camera's were placed in his home due to reason's I don't wish to disclose (to protect others) however Charles is not the only one who knew about these cameras. Due to these camera's recording 24 hour footage most of which had never even been viewed by anyone, there was reports made by a 16 year old female that I can't disclose. Based on several factors Charles chose to plead guilty to sexual exploitation, which does not mean any sexual abuse occurred by him. Because cameras were purchased using "interstate or foreign commerce" and the said minor was captured on video doing sexually inappropriate things to herself, these videos were not used for sales or any inappropriate usage. I want to also include that Charles has never even so much as had a speeding ticket prior to this, unfortunately fighting the feds is not worth the money, and up until his recent decision to plead guilty he had not even been to court yet. Meaning for 2 + years he has been detained before even appearing before a judge, at this point he just wants to move on. I would also like to point out that the state dropped all their charges against him. Just remember there are always 2 sides to a story.
(b) Any parent, legal guardian, or person having custody or control of a minor who knowingly permits such minor to engage in, or to assist any other person to engage in, sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct or for the purpose of transmitting a live visual depiction of such conduct shall be punished as provided under subsection (e) of this section, if such parent, legal guardian, or person knows or has reason to know that such visual depiction will be transported or transmitted using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or mailed, if that visual depiction was produced or transmitted using materials that have been mailed, shipped, or transported in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or if such visual depiction has actually been transported or transmitted using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or mailed.
Flash FXP will continue to be sold at this time, however support is not available.
|
|
|
05-08-2019, 10:52 AM
|
#3
|
Junior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester ioFTPD Foundation User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 12
|
I've been using FFXP since 2004 and I'm hoping support eventually comes back. Maybe Charles can get some good karma on his side by releasing source code to another developer (although I know that would be a very tough decision).
|
|
|
05-10-2019, 04:26 PM
|
#4
|
Super Duper
FlashFXP Beta Tester
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,881
|
You do not need to concern yourself what I believe or do.
However, yes I will continue to close and/or delete threads if you dox people.
Why do you keep coming back to this forum? Move on with your life and leave this be.
__________________
[Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB]
|
|
|
05-15-2019, 12:19 PM
|
#5
|
Junior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2
|
What a stupid load of prats, Let he without sin cast the first stone, therefore take a good look at yourself before you condemn others. Its none of your bloody business who I pay and for what. I have used FlashFXP since its conception and I will continue to do so, I and I alone will decide what I buy and from whom. I don't need to read your vile drivel.
Charles you carry on, don't listen to these low lifes. I bet their not squeaky clean either. And as for them, go and grow up will you and get a life. She must have known that the cameras where there, and was playing up to them. At 16 she should be ashamed of herself, she knew what she was doing.
Don't ever come on here and tell me what I can and cannot do with my money.
Gerry
|
|
|
05-15-2019, 01:07 PM
|
#6
|
Junior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark
|
You Sick twat, do you not think he pled guilty to avoid the immense court & defence costs, and also from what I have read on the case, she knew she was on camera, and getting pleasure from it, she was the one committing the offence not Charles displaying conduct like that, if I were her parent, I would have her locked up in an asylum the little whore, but then its always the male who gets the blame, the female is always Lily white. At her age masterbating in front of a camera at 16 years of age, in this country she is an adult at 16, you should grow up and smell the coffee, there are always two sides to a story.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 PM.
|