What's the average delay to get a reply on !bw ?

[Harm]

Topic says it all.
Use !bw a couple of times and select the average reply time.
If possible, reply to this thread with windrop version, windows version and general server infos (cpu/mem). And any other informations you might find usefull.

Note: this poll is only for ioBanana v20rc2 and above users.

[Mave_2]

Ok here some nfo

I have delay 2-5 secs Sometimes also under 2 but thats rarely

Using : Eggdrop v1.6.15 No SSL atm
ioFTPD 5.8.5r
ioB RC2b

[netz]

1 sec

Using:
Eggdrop v1.6.16+notesfix No SSL
WinXP SP1
Pentium 4 CPU 2.53GHz
512 MB

ioFTPD 5.8.5r
ioB RC2b

[ChipMunk666]

12seconds

AMD 1800 1024MB ram
Windrop Eggdrop v1.6.13 Cygwin binary 32+handlen
ioFTPD 5.8.5
iobananaRC2b.
Local ircserver

[leeson]

3-6 sec

Amd 1733 Mhz
512 Mb Ram
Eggdrop v1.6.16
ioFTPD v5.85
ioBanana v20 rc2b

[Mave_2]

New test done

Eggdrop v1.6.16 NO SSL
ioFTPD 5.8.5r
ioBRC3
Windows XP SP1
PIIII 2.40 ghz
512MB Ram

Connection Eggdrop Host-->bnc---->ircnetwork

[ChipMunk666]

with rc3 i have !bw like average 1-2 sec.
But leechers and uploaders still take 5-6 seconds.
GOOD WORK on the !bw command

[Kimezy]

delay 10 secs

Athlon XP 2500+
768MB DDR
Windows XP Pro
ioFTPD 5.8.5r
ioBanana v20 RC3
Windrop 1.6.16

[Bygone]

less than 2 seconds on both my sites...

windrop v1.6.13 and windrop v1.6.16

system1:
2.4 ghz p4 w/2gb memory

system2:
3.0 ghz p4 w/1gb memory

[ChipMunk666]

NEW TEST
!bw exact 14 seconds :(
RC3

Each time i get 14 seconds for !leechers !uploaders nd !bw

[shockerz]

Lag

Eggdrop v1.6.13 NO SSL and v1.6.16 No SSL
ioFTPD 5.8.5r
iobanana v20rc3
Windows 2003
P4 3.4 ghz
2GB Ram

!bw 7-12 secs

other cmds 5-8secs lag

[MidasKing]

less than 2 seconds...


Eggdrop v1.6.15 NO SSL ioFTPD 5.8.5r
iobanana v20rc3
Windows 2003
P4 1.8 ghz
512Mb Ram

[ThomasH]

12 sec+

Both !bw, !leechers and !uploaders takes a lot of time and the CPU usage hits 100% every time.

Its the eggdrop, ie. iobannana.tcl that goes to 100%.

I cant see where I might have made a goof in the setup, but any input on this would be appriciated.

And yes that Writediz=1 is set in ioB.ini.

Computer is a P4 2.4GGHz, running W2k with 1024MB ram.

There are no users on it atm. exept the odd admin and sitebot itself.


Any idea as to why?

/Thomas

[romracer]

eggdrop v1.6.15, on CYGWIN_NT-5.2 1.3.22(0.78/3/2) NO SSL or other patches
ioFTPD 5.8.5r
iobanana v20 pre rc4
Windows 2003
Dual Athlon 2100 MPs
1GB RAM
eggdrop runs on an irc server on the same subnet.

no lag at all.

[Harm]

Since the problem doesn't seem to come from the hardware configuration, i'll need some help.
I would like to do some tests at home with the bots used by those who have voted '5 seconds or more'.

Feel free to contact me on irc (#ioBanana @ EFnet) or via pm on this board if you are one of them.

[Lathieza]

eggdrop v1.6.15+SSL, on CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.3.22(0.78/3/2)
ioftpd 5.8.5r
iobanana V20rc4
ioa 1.1.5

winxp prof sp1
amd XP 3000+
1 gig mem

10+ secs to get reply on !bw !uploaders ect ect

1 user and 1 sitebot

[Harm]

This seems to be fixed in v20pre1 which will be available soon.

[ThomasH]

I will look forward to that.

Will it be available through the foundation download? - currently I dont see any of the RC versions in the member section...

Good work anyway

/Thomas

[Harm]

It'll be there once the scripts section will allow ppl to post scripts again.

[razorhead]

If it's any use:

P4 2.8 Ghz
512 MB ram
Windows 2000 Server
Eggdrop NT 1.6.15
ioFTPD version: 5-8-4r
ioBanana version: 20 rc4 (20/06/2004)

Reply: 90% of the time 0,5 second.
other times: 2 seconds.

[PopWeasel]

test comp specs:
P4 2.8Ghz 800Mhz FSB 1MB L2 Cache Prescott w/HT
1GB 400Mhz DDR in Dual Channel Mode
2 SATA-150 hdd's in RAID-0 config running OS
1 SATA-150 hdd running site
WinXP SP1

test load:
1 sitebot
1 uploader
1 admin idler

test irc config:
Windrop with direct connection to ircd.

test result in partyline:
bw123: request processed in 0 seconds for PopWeasel

test result in chan:
[BANDWIDTH] - Up: 1 at 555.0KB/s - Dn: 0 at 0.0KB/s - Total: 1 at 555.0KB/s.

test comments:
It actually took abt 1 second to respond in chan.

[PopWeasel]

I should add that I was one of the ones that had that lag issue with !bw with ioBanana.19.full. So it's possible that you've found & squashed the bug that was causing that although I couldn't say for sure as a lot of my config has changed since then including hardware. Back then I was using:

AMD Athlon XP 2200+
1GB PC2100 DDR
2 ATA-133 drives in RAID-0 config running OS
1 ATA-133 drive running site

It caused cpu to go 100% for abt 20-30 secs...hope some of this data helps you with that problem.

[Harm]

According to ppl in #ioBanana, this has been fixed in v20pre1.

[ChipMunk666]

yup i get 1-2seconds now on !bw :D

:banana: :banana: :banana: