| StarDog's scripts ioZS, newday |
10-20-2003, 07:20 PM
|
#181
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11
|
I've a big problem on a site. I use ioZS 1.08 and often happened that on the sites it shows 100% files ok when an upload is finished, then when i fxp to other sites i see that files that he consider perfect are not ok. If i do a rescan with ioZS on the sites where all seems ok, the bad files appears, same that on race it consider perfect and check as ok...with a rescan are bad
I've seen and re-seen many times the config, but it'seems perfect.
Tnx to help me... 
|
|
|
|
10-20-2003, 08:27 PM
|
#182
|
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 236
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BrAv3HeArT
I've a big problem on a site. I use ioZS 1.08 and often happened that on the sites it shows 100% files ok when an upload is finished, then when i fxp to other sites i see that files that he consider perfect are not ok. If i do a rescan with ioZS on the sites where all seems ok, the bad files appears, same that on race it consider perfect and check as ok...with a rescan are bad
I've seen and re-seen many times the config, but it'seems perfect.
Tnx to help me...
|
Sounds like a problem someone else had...It ended up being another script was installed and marking the files .bad...Try removing all other scripts exept ioZS...
|
|
|
|
|
10-21-2003, 01:38 AM
|
#183
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 21
|
Ok thanks for ur support stardog, i will take a look at this thx .
|
|
|
|
|
10-21-2003, 07:32 AM
|
#184
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11
|
The only script that i've on file upload in ioftpd.ini with ioZS is the nfourl.itcl, included in dzbot 0.90, is possible that is it to make ioZS works bad?
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2003, 06:11 AM
|
#185
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11
|
no way, i've tryed to remove also nfourl.itcl but same results...bad files that seems ok to ioZS, then with a rescan appears bad as are really... 
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2003, 10:46 AM
|
#186
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 231
|
sounds to me like if the files get written bad to your hd, you running scsi or ide?
could also be a bad hd, or shit memory :|
or some program killing them after their written :/
either way its not normal hehe
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2003, 11:13 AM
|
#187
|
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 236
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BrAv3HeArT
no way, i've tryed to remove also nfourl.itcl but same results...bad files that seems ok to ioZS, then with a rescan appears bad as are really...
|
Yup, sounds like something else is corrupting your files. I'd also make sure permissions are set so people can't write to completed files.
|
|
|
|
|
10-24-2003, 03:56 PM
|
#188
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 131
|
with latest io ... sfv check seems to freak out
it doesnt list all uploaded files in .ioftpd.race ... just happens when speed is above 3-5mb/sec
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2003, 10:37 AM
|
#189
|
|
Junior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 26
|
**************************************
bullshit *.dizs
[L] 200 PORT command successful.
[L] STOR file_id.diz
[L] 150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for file_id.diz.
[R] RETR file_id.diz
[R] 550 file_id.diz: Permission denied.
[R] ABOR
[R] 500 'BOR': Command not understood.
[L] ABOR
[L] 226 ABOR command successful.
i often have a permission denied for pda-file_id.diz and then complete upload hangs
is there any possibility to skip them after special time-duration.Anyway nice sript Star
cheers optixxx
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2003, 11:32 AM
|
#190
|
|
Junior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5
|
STATS_USERTOP and STATS_GROUPTOP
I use ioFTPD and ioZS first time.
"USER TOP" and "GROUP TOP" do not display on irc channel.
This is "ioftpd.log" file.
10-31-2003 22:45:46 NEWDIR: "ioFTPD" "ioftpd" "/REQUEST/***" "g:\REQUEST\***"
10-31-2003 22:45:46 SFV: "/REQUEST/***" "-SFV- ***. Expecting \00229\002F."
10-31-2003 22:45:51 UPDATE: "/REQUEST/***" "-1ST- \002ioFTPD\002/ioftpd was the first to upload file in \002***\002. Expecting \002414.8MB\002."
10-31-2003 22:46:42 HALFWAY: "/REQUEST/***" "-50%- \002***\002 is in halfway. Leading uploader is \002ioFTPD\002/ioftpd [214.6MB/15F/100%/5229KB/s]."
10-31-2003 22:47:30 COMPLETE: "/REQUEST/***" "-END- \002***\002 [\002405\002mB/\00229\002F] was completed by \002ioFTPD\002/ioftpd. ( \0025.5MBps\002/\0021\002m \00239\002s )."
10-31-2003 22:48:25 LOGOUT: "FTP_Service" "ioFTPD" "ioftpd" ....
in ioFTPD.ini (use 5.2.9u)
...
[Events]
...
OnUploadComplete = EXEC ..\scripts\ioZS\ioZS.exe Upload
OnUploadError = EXEC ..\scripts\ioZS\ioZS.exe Upload
...
[Post]
...
dele = EXEC ..\scripts\ioZS\ioZS.exe Delete
...
[Scripts]
...
rescan = EXEC ..\scripts\ioZS\ioZS.exe Rescan
...
plz help me
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2003, 11:50 AM
|
#191
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 231
|
Stardog disabled that as a whole if theres no racers...
Maybe he'll add variable in future so you can add that crap again.
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2003, 01:57 PM
|
#192
|
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User
ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
please, do not paste those release names here..
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2003, 04:36 PM
|
#193
|
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 703
|
release names removed
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2003, 07:24 AM
|
#194
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 21
|
Hi stardog i've a problem, when someone fxp something in bad alternative modes, it create 0 byte files (not missing files) that can be overwritten only by the owner. If the owner don't see it or went out, i've to delete it manually because if not nobody can finish the upload. Any solution for that in ioZS?
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2003, 11:08 AM
|
#195
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 25
|
site rescan ?
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
 Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 PM.
|
