What's the average delay to get a reply on !bw ?

[Lathieza]

eggdrop v1.6.15+SSL, on CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.3.22(0.78/3/2)
ioftpd 5.8.5r
iobanana V20rc4
ioa 1.1.5

winxp prof sp1
amd XP 3000+
1 gig mem

10+ secs to get reply on !bw !uploaders ect ect

1 user and 1 sitebot

[Harm]

This seems to be fixed in v20pre1 which will be available soon.

[ThomasH]

I will look forward to that.

Will it be available through the foundation download? - currently I dont see any of the RC versions in the member section...

Good work anyway

/Thomas

[Harm]

It'll be there once the scripts section will allow ppl to post scripts again.

[razorhead]

If it's any use:

P4 2.8 Ghz
512 MB ram
Windows 2000 Server
Eggdrop NT 1.6.15
ioFTPD version: 5-8-4r
ioBanana version: 20 rc4 (20/06/2004)

Reply: 90% of the time 0,5 second.
other times: 2 seconds.

[PopWeasel]

test comp specs:
P4 2.8Ghz 800Mhz FSB 1MB L2 Cache Prescott w/HT
1GB 400Mhz DDR in Dual Channel Mode
2 SATA-150 hdd's in RAID-0 config running OS
1 SATA-150 hdd running site
WinXP SP1

test load:
1 sitebot
1 uploader
1 admin idler

test irc config:
Windrop with direct connection to ircd.

test result in partyline:
bw123: request processed in 0 seconds for PopWeasel

test result in chan:
[BANDWIDTH] - Up: 1 at 555.0KB/s - Dn: 0 at 0.0KB/s - Total: 1 at 555.0KB/s.

test comments:
It actually took abt 1 second to respond in chan.

[PopWeasel]

I should add that I was one of the ones that had that lag issue with !bw with ioBanana.19.full. So it's possible that you've found & squashed the bug that was causing that although I couldn't say for sure as a lot of my config has changed since then including hardware. Back then I was using:

AMD Athlon XP 2200+
1GB PC2100 DDR
2 ATA-133 drives in RAID-0 config running OS
1 ATA-133 drive running site

It caused cpu to go 100% for abt 20-30 secs...hope some of this data helps you with that problem.

[Harm]

According to ppl in #ioBanana, this has been fixed in v20pre1.

[ChipMunk666]

yup i get 1-2seconds now on !bw

:banana: :banana: :banana: