ioFTPD General New releases, comments, questions regarding the latest version of ioFTPD. |
02-12-2004, 07:57 PM
|
#16
|
Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 78
|
Re: weird
Quote:
Originally posted by Sersen
can´t get it working
what i did:
i extracted all files on my drive(for a clean test)
haven´t done any php files installation yet(don´t need the webinterface yet)
if i start ioftpd.exe this popup appears
using winxp sp1 with latest patches-german
translation(or something ): Entrypoint "FileTimeToSystemTime" isn´t available in kernel32.dll
not sure if its my fault but wanna let you know,its the first time ioFTPD isn´t starting here,last release works like a charm 5.6.3r
bye
|
same here ... how to fix ????
|
|
|
02-12-2004, 09:03 PM
|
#17
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
Watermark is breaking the executable.. unfortunately guy who did the watermarking tool is 'out of town' for few days => I will release 'u' version of 5.7, so those intersted - can play with the httpd.
|
|
|
02-12-2004, 11:39 PM
|
#18
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
Ok, issues fixed.
Watermark: I had changed project settings to something which were not compatible with watermarkking.
ioFTPD account: php module "breaks" string comparison function (after initializing php, strcmp returns does not return same values it return without php module)
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 05:12 AM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 298
|
big bug found hehe
.ioFTPD files are named .ioFPPD and .ioF@PD and some other things, depending on what machine you run it on..
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 07:41 AM
|
#20
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 79
|
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 08:27 AM
|
#21
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 131
|
confirmed ... and .ioftpd files are all visible
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 08:27 AM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Pichento
Neato d1.
But site who (swho) takes forever. like 3-5 seconds to execute. used to be instant. I'm using addicts sitewho (i think)
yeah seems as if it needs a revision with ioFTPD 5.7.x. Hope addict gets it out soon..
Stability seems fine so far. only tested it for 30 minutes tho..
|
Exactly same problem here on 5.7.3r...
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 02:56 PM
|
#23
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
I think, this may have to do something with watermarkking. (atleast .ioFTPD file is casued by it)
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 02:58 PM
|
#24
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
Try 'u' version, and see if it has problem with swho.
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 04:56 PM
|
#25
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
Ahh, you're using external who binaries.. latest .u fixes it
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 08:31 PM
|
#26
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
Originally posted by darkone
Ahh, you're using external who binaries.. latest .u fixes it
|
dark0n3,I am registered member, so why would I want to use 'u' version? Can you fix it on the 'r' version too?
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 08:48 PM
|
#27
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Pharaoh
dark0n3,I am registered member, so why would I want to use 'u' version? Can you fix it on the 'r' version too?
|
I'm with you, should'nt paying users be able to use stuff before non-paying users? thats what we paid for, to use stuff that .u users dont have access to?
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 08:51 PM
|
#28
|
Too much time...
FlashFXP Beta Tester ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,326
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Pharaoh
dark0n3,I am registered member, so why would I want to use 'u' version? Can you fix it on the 'r' version too?
|
Please read the whole post before commenting.
Quote:
Originally posted by dark0n3
Watermark is breaking the executable.. unfortunately guy who did the watermarking tool is 'out of town' for few days => I will release 'u' version of 5.7, so those intersted - can play with the httpd.
|
It will be fixed once this guy returns, until then a registered version will have to wait.
Btw, 5.7 is still a bit unstable" so no "real" rush to upgrade to it. If you wish to test it out, try the 'u' version.
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 08:52 PM
|
#29
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 298
|
k..
|
|
|
02-13-2004, 09:00 PM
|
#30
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
Originally posted by NeoXed
Please read the whole post before commenting.
|
I did read the whole post. d1 wrote this after he released the 5.7r and then he released 3 more versions, so I figured he got the watermark part fixed already, otherwise he wouldn't released more 'r' versions as he said....
He also wrote:
Quote:
Ok, issues fixed.
Watermark: I had changed project settings to something which were not compatible with watermarkking.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 PM.
|