| ioFTPD General New releases, comments, questions regarding the latest version of ioFTPD. |
11-05-2003, 12:21 PM
|
#1
|
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User
ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
5.4.x
You got your speedlimits & itcl expansion. Currently I'm working on long awaited module documentation & next generation directory cache. (it will cache whole directory list, not just permissions & directory sizes - providing even faster listings [atleast in theory  , currently listing directory of 1000 files takes ~100ms of cputime])
|
|
|
|
11-05-2003, 12:53 PM
|
#2
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 26
|
Optimizing is good, faster listings and best mem/cpu usage
Its all good already. I think ioftpd is becoming the best daemon ever. Great work 
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2003, 02:12 PM
|
#3
|
|
Junior Member
ioFTPD Foundation User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 12
|
it just gets better and better everyday, great work D1 :banana:
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2003, 04:57 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 273
|
If you got plans to optimize your bw limiter
Could it be possible to get the limiter to work after you typed in the limit?
Now you have to wait untill user disconnect or complete a current file to get the bw limiter to work.
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2003, 05:06 AM
|
#5
|
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User
ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
It'd be extremely difficult.. I can't see any reason why one would be changing user speedlimits constantly
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2003, 07:54 AM
|
#6
|
|
Junior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 14
|
Not 'constantly' but sometimes a situation does arise where you need to throttle everyone immediately, or uncap them so they can quickly finish their transfers, etc.
Having to cycle all connections is a horrible pain currently... Please?
-VolVE
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2003, 08:59 AM
|
#7
|
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User
ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
I understand such need for global bandwidth limits... but not for per user; and global bandwidth limits take place as soon as rehash is called.
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2003, 09:08 AM
|
#8
|
|
Junior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 14
|
What's wrong with per user bandwidth limits?
If an admin logs into a site for example, shouldn't he be able to have his own bandwidth limit, just like he can have his on VFS?
-VolVE
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2003, 09:10 AM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 53
|
Maybe i'm wrong... but where is version 5.3.*?
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2003, 10:07 AM
|
#10
|
|
Posse Member
Ultimate Scripter
ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,956
|
VolVE: he does have (can have) his own bandwidth limit.
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2003, 10:31 AM
|
#11
|
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User
ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
Quote:
Originally posted by PaJa
Maybe i'm wrong... but where is version 5.3.*?
|
5.3.x is the one i'm currently working on.
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2003, 07:25 PM
|
#12
|
|
Member
ioFTPD Foundation User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 83
|
to change instantly bw limits i'm us d to:
- change bw to user
- kill user in order to force his reconnection
i understand the d1 problem to managebdynamic bw on an user!
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2003, 11:55 PM
|
#13
|
|
Too much time...
FlashFXP Beta Tester
ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,326
|
Any chance of adding....
A OnFtpDisconnect event, triggered when a user is kicked, quits, or disconnects from the FTP etc. For a script I'm working on.
An exempt flag for idle disconnects, any user with 'X' as a flag is no longer disconnected for idling. (for sitebot's mainly.)
Word 
|
|
|
|
|
11-09-2003, 07:10 PM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
Originally posted by darkone
5.3.x is the one i'm currently working on.
|
dark0n3, just curios...since priorities have changed...what's the current main focus in the 5.3.x development...httpd? anything else?
|
|
|
|
|
11-11-2003, 05:05 PM
|
#15
|
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User
ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
Focus is now on directory cache..
While current implementation can retrieve data for ~1000 directories per second (with -la), new implementation can retrieve them for nearly 100k directories per second (+ it gets permissions for any files in directory without additional cost) Amount of memory copying has been reduced to minimal by using "reference counters" for cached objects. Disk access is far more optimized.... and .ioFTPD files redesigned
I'll also add some statistic cookies (cache hits, misses, flushes, hash collisions)
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
 Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.
|
