ioFTPD General New releases, comments, questions regarding the latest version of ioFTPD. |
09-23-2003, 03:29 PM
|
#1
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
5.1.0 discussion
Main focus has been on modules, optimizations & code clean-up.. however, if there is something small that you would like to see in it, post your suggestion here...
I think, that I have already mentioned on irc (efnet #ioftpd), that 5.2.0 will be focused on http admin interface. 5.3.0 should be first version to include some sort of speed limits (per device & per user) and 5.4.0 will introduce encryption threads & remove os buffering from sockets and files.
As usual, I'm not giving you any dates.. and if you dare to keep asking me about release dates, you can be sure that you get ignored permanently You may, and should however, discuss about features, timelines (priorities) & such.
... ahh yes, 5.1.0 should be done by this weekend
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 03:36 PM
|
#2
|
Posse Member
Ultimate Scripter ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,956
|
I already mentionned that, but would be good to be able to switch speed limiting checks on and off, so there would be no performance decrease if we don't want to limit bw usage.
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 03:42 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 91
|
I'm begging for a flame here, but:
I'd like an option to toss .ioftpd and it's symlinks and just use NT acl's.
*asbestos suit on*
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 03:45 PM
|
#4
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 6
|
If possible, give us the ability to schedule turning of limits on and off for the entire sites bandwidth, upstream and downstream seperately.
Something that may also be useful is to be able to set a maximum amount of data that is allowed to be transferred through the site on a monthly basis. If the transfer gets to be near the site limit, the site warns M users, if the site gets to the limit, it does not allow transfers unless reset.. just a thought
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 04:11 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 236
|
I guess then I'll be waiting for 5.3...io badly needs bandwidth limits...http interface is not as necessary as the bandwidth limits in my opinion.
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 04:19 PM
|
#6
|
Too much time...
FlashFXP Beta Tester ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,326
|
Adding an idle exception flag, so any user with "X" as a flag does not have an idle time out. (For sitebots)
Probably already metioned, just thought I would bring it up.
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 05:12 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 221
|
yes, allso are for BW limitation, both for for /server and /user !
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 11:30 PM
|
#8
|
Guest
|
Build in site user command for users to see stats about themselves, as in glFTPD.
|
|
|
09-24-2003, 12:24 AM
|
#9
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
Originally posted by uprise
Build in site user command for users to see stats about themselves, as in glFTPD.
|
[Scripts]
me = !..\text\ftp\uinfo.msg
|
|
|
09-24-2003, 02:37 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
Originally posted by StarDog
I guess then I'll be waiting for 5.3...io badly needs bandwidth limits...http interface is not as necessary as the bandwidth limits in my opinion.
|
i agree with stardog
have fun
bounty
|
|
|
09-24-2003, 03:40 AM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 327
|
Idle time per user / group is my biggest wish.
D1, you said it could be done easilly for b5, but I think you forgot about it.
Try doing a site user on glftpd. id really like the same options for ioftpd.
1. idle time
2. max ul & download threads
Godspeed
|
|
|
09-24-2003, 03:58 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
ioFTPD Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bounty
i agree with stardog
|
me 4x too
|
|
|
09-24-2003, 05:16 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 194
|
BW items for me as well...all else right now are not a must.
I need to get IO "back" online...and this is what has been stopping me. (Raiden is failing files...as per normal...argh!!!!!)
1 - Global for us that have to cut main bw on in or outbound...
2 - Per user settings
This is what I am waiting for.
TW
|
|
|
09-24-2003, 06:19 AM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 543
|
And per group!! Then global for server (in + out limiting) or seperate in free and out limited etc..
|
|
|
09-24-2003, 10:41 AM
|
#15
|
Moderator
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 1,070
|
one more to agree with stardog
you should swap the 5.2 and 5.3 priorities. BW limiting is FAR more important than http interface. And i know this has been mentioned but, can "run as native nt service" get on the list soon? if 5.2 could incorporate those 2 things, i'd be "tickled pink!" Good luck d1!
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 AM.
|