View Poll Results: Please vote:
|
I want SSH/SFTP support in FlashFXP
|
![](https://oss.azurewebsites.net/forum/images/polls/bar2-l.png) ![](https://oss.azurewebsites.net/forum/images/polls/bar2.png) ![](https://oss.azurewebsites.net/forum/images/polls/bar2-r.png)
|
33 |
97.06% |
I don't want SSH/SFTP support in FlashFXP
|
![](https://oss.azurewebsites.net/forum/images/polls/bar3-l.png) ![](https://oss.azurewebsites.net/forum/images/polls/bar3.png) ![](https://oss.azurewebsites.net/forum/images/polls/bar3-r.png)
|
1 |
2.94% |
09-17-2007, 08:41 PM
|
#1
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
|
SFTP/SSH Petition
Lets make it official and see how many people will vote for SFTP/SSH support in FlashFXP.
|
|
|
09-23-2007, 01:30 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 421
|
There are plenty that would like it, myself included, there has never been any question about that. It has been stated many times thats its on the todo list, but it would require such significant changes that it is unlikely to happen until flashfxp is completely recoded (along with proper tabs and multithreading)
|
|
|
09-23-2007, 05:44 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lombardia / Varese
Posts: 167
|
Yes, I'd like to have SFTP/SSH support
But I wait when will be ready, because need a code rewrite and will be available in FlashFXP v4 (as wrote in past by bigstar)
Miki
__________________
* FlashFXP v[5].[3].[0], build [3930], [x]registered
* * * --> FlashFXP in ITALIANO <-- * * *
* * * --> http://michele.beriola.it/ <-- * * *
* * * --> FlashFXP in italiano <-- * * *
* OS [x] Windows 7 Home Premium
* Running Antivirus [x] Yes, Name [ESET Smart Security v4.2.71.3]
* Running Firewall [x] Yes, Name [ESET Smart Security v4.2.71.3]
* Network [x] VDSL [Technicolor AG plus VDNT-S Router VDSL2]
|
|
|
12-16-2007, 04:29 PM
|
#4
|
Junior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
|
I'm all for SFTP.
Web servers increasingly rely on SSHd over FTPd to provide a transport mechanism. In my opinion, FlashFXP would greatly increase in value should SFTP be added. In fact, i'd be willing to pay extra for an SFTP module should it be made available (in the form of a major version upgrade, for instance).
If you raise the cost of base FlashFXP/incur a cost on upgrades, offer SFTP, you could get marginally renumerated for your added time in recoding the app.
I'd be fine with it.
Also, I think this poll is a little bit misleading. Every user will plainly vote "yes" in favor of an enhancement such as SFTP. The real question is, would you pay an extra $X dollars for SFTP. If the cost was reasonable (under 15 bucks), i vote Yes.
|
|
|
12-16-2007, 05:11 PM
|
#5
|
FlashFXP Developer
FlashFXP Administrator ioFTPD Beta Tester
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,012
|
One immediate solution is to use BitVise Tunnelier http://www.bitvise.com/ftp-bridge provides a SFTP to FTP bridge, Tunnelier can normally be used free of charge if it is used by less than 5 people and on less than 5 machines in an organizational department.
We plan to offer SFTP support in the future, we're just not entirely sure how it's going to be done, at the moment simply dropping SFTP into the existing FlashFXP code base isn't an option. One option would be to rely on something similar to the Tunnelier but have it completely seamless.
|
|
|
12-16-2007, 05:27 PM
|
#6
|
Junior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
|
the average user wont care how you implement it, just that you do, providing that you're not incurring too much of a performance impact. I use WinSCP for SFTP. There *are* many options out there .. it's just a matter of convenience to be able to perform all file transport related tasks in one program.
I'm sure you know what i'm saying Bigstar.
Again, i'd be willing to pay for it, and I suspect that many other users might.
|
|
|
12-17-2007, 09:07 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 421
|
The rewrite is still on the agenda i hope (if not already planned out?). It would definately be a conciderable amount of work, but i believe worth the effort in the long run in terms of flashfxp's future.
There are a conciderable amount of increasingly popular and requested features that simply can not be easily implemented into the current codebase (multithreading, tabs, ssh and other protocol support, scriptability, etc) which many of the competing programs are increasingly supporting and implementing.
Lets take FTPRush/UltraFXP as a quick example, i can tell you from first hand use and from opinions spoken to me by many users of that particular alternative that the main reasons they choose it over FlashFXP despite its bugs and annoyances is because it supports tabbed sessions, scriptability, and multiple protocols (although only ssh and tftp).
I guess as a user, i cant help but wonder how long FlashFXP can continue without moving forwards in regards to these increasingly in-demand features. And just how long before alternatives improve to the point where people are not making performance/reliability/stability sacrifices by choosing an alternative.
I can certainly understand the situation that arises from this, in regards to justifying the work required to undergo such a rewrite, while still trying to honor the free 'lifetime upgrades' as best you can. I can definately see how any sort of upgrade charge could annoy some users, but i think most of the heavy users (myself included) would have no problem with an upgrade fee (to a Pro version as i think was mentioned once or twice a long time ago).
Just some scattered thoughts as usual.
|
|
|
01-29-2008, 03:42 PM
|
#8
|
Junior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
|
as mentioned before - most of the heavy users would probably pay a fee for that kind of implementation. Personally I wouldn't hesitate.
|
|
|
03-07-2008, 04:57 AM
|
#9
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
|
SSH Support IS very important!
I am a reged user since the beginning of FlashFXP, BUT the "NO SSH-Support" is the only reason why I do not use FlashFXP anymore. FlashFXP was (unfortunately) my favorite FTP/SSH Client but we need SSH/SCP support...
Therefore, PLEASE implement SSH support - and you will have a lot more customers - believe me.
|
|
|
03-11-2008, 06:11 AM
|
#10
|
Junior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
|
I vote for SSH support.
Regards
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 02:02 AM
|
#11
|
FlashFXP Developer
FlashFXP Administrator ioFTPD Beta Tester
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,012
|
SFTP support will be added in the next few weeks. Development started last week.
|
|
|
04-17-2008, 10:28 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester ioFTPD Foundation User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 301
|
just mean the beta testers have to wait until we can get our grubby little mitts on it
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 10:55 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lombardia / Varese
Posts: 167
|
Really
__________________
* FlashFXP v[5].[3].[0], build [3930], [x]registered
* * * --> FlashFXP in ITALIANO <-- * * *
* * * --> http://michele.beriola.it/ <-- * * *
* * * --> FlashFXP in italiano <-- * * *
* OS [x] Windows 7 Home Premium
* Running Antivirus [x] Yes, Name [ESET Smart Security v4.2.71.3]
* Running Firewall [x] Yes, Name [ESET Smart Security v4.2.71.3]
* Network [x] VDSL [Technicolor AG plus VDNT-S Router VDSL2]
|
|
|
05-26-2008, 07:36 PM
|
#14
|
Super Duper
FlashFXP Beta Tester
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,881
|
i'm closing this thread since sftp is already implemented.
__________________
[Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB]
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.
|