PDA

View Full Version : ioA 0.7.2 is out


WarC
03-26-2003, 05:48 PM
Finally!

This version support ioFTPD 4.6.1+ vfs system and all seems to be go go go. If any bugs please report them. There have been lots and lots of changes in this version so PLEEASE read manual and changelog (bottom of manual for those that apparently can't find it).

http://warc.mine.nu



/WarC

Zer0Racer
03-26-2003, 05:53 PM
Nice work!! :D :D ;) :cool: :p :D

Sup3rm4n
03-26-2003, 06:52 PM
i love you =)

tnemec
03-26-2003, 07:05 PM
Thanks.
:)

Unique
03-26-2003, 07:36 PM
:D :cool:

Mouton
03-27-2003, 01:05 AM
working great! :) Thx.

Mouton
03-27-2003, 01:06 AM
Seems u can't make 2 requests...


site request test
200- REQUEST
200-_________________________________________________
200- Added request:
200- Mouton >-->> test
200-_________________________________________________
200-
200-
200 Command Successful.

site request test2
200- Already requested.
200-_________________________________________________
200-
200 Command Successful.

site request patate
200- Already requested.
200-_________________________________________________
200-
200 Command Successful.

site request
200- REQUEST
200-_________________________________________________
200- Mouton >-->> test
200-_________________________________________________
200-
200 Command Successful.

terencehe
03-27-2003, 01:30 AM
i can't visit your homepage,can you attach in this forum?tks.

The page cannot be displayed

WarC
03-27-2003, 04:10 AM
my explorer died and that was apparently vital for XP but its up now

Mouton I still looking at this.

Gotrekk
03-27-2003, 04:32 AM
Same prob as Mouton here.... can't request ... everything is already requested

Great work anyhow :)
Gotrekk

WarC
03-27-2003, 07:26 AM
Ok updated to ioA 0.7.3.

This will fix that requestissue and also msg issues.

http://warc.mine.nu


/WarC

azert
03-27-2003, 11:52 AM
2WarC:

Can you add into ioA this feature,pls?

TODAY symlinks

example:
"/TODAY" (symlink) redirect to "/0DAY/%M%D"


thx

Sup3rm4n
03-27-2003, 01:29 PM
yes plz that would be very nice!!

WarC
03-27-2003, 03:28 PM
That is on todo yup.

Since i have not done anything with symlinks yet I must check how it works. Yes there might be probles atm when wiping incomplete stuff or nuking I Havnt tested that since I dont have any symlinks to test on :)

/WarC

azert
03-27-2003, 03:28 PM
2WarC:

ioA 0.7.3 bug?

2 x site request ...


250- ú s i t e r e q u e s t s ú
250- _________________________________ __________________________________________
250- \\_________ \ _____/ _ _/ | _/ _____/ ______/__ ____/ ______//
250- __/ :|\_____/ ___/__ /_/ \_ :| \_ ___/_______ :\_/ \______ :\_
250- \\----|_____\__ :|___ /________/__ :|________/_______/_________//
250- +---------------)_____|-/____/------------)_____|---------------------------+
250- ú s i t e r e q u e s t s ú
250- _________________________________ __________________________________________
250- \\_________ \ _____/ _ _/ | _/ _____/ ______/__ ____/ ______//
250- __/ :|\_____/ ___/__ /_/ \_ :| \_ ___/_______ :\_/ \______ :\_
250- \\----|_____\__ :|___ /________/__ :|________/_______/_________//
250- [azert2] rls1-test
250- [azertik] rls2-test2
250- +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+


duplicate ioA.request.head.msg :( in .ioFTPD.message



and next feature:


i need align
250- [azert2] rls1-test
250- [azertik] rls2-test2

to

250- [azert2 ] rls1-test
250- [azertik] rls2-test2


thx for Re.

NeoRanga
03-28-2003, 07:53 PM
I can't unnuke a release, nuke works fine, but when I want to unnuke the same release it returns me
200--[Unnuke]--------------------------------------------------------
200-
200-abnormal program termination
200 Command Successful.

I see in ioa.debug but nothing about the error, only the command I enter :( Any idea?

WarC
03-29-2003, 04:55 AM
azert:

Have you changed anything in that header. If you remove the header from stored requestfile and run some requests does it become double again then or not?

This shit with align and not. I get yelled at for having it and when I changed it to be a bit more custom as wanted I get yelled for that. How should it be to make someone happy !?!?


NeoRanga:

Hard to say what it can be. Noone have reported any problems with unnuke. I need some more info to be able to check it. Talk to me on irc would be best.
was it leechusers?
empty dir?
multiple users or one that own files within?

tC!
03-29-2003, 08:50 AM
i also vote for aligned requesters names (azert's post) :)

azert
03-29-2003, 01:49 PM
2WarC:

ad "align user in request output":
this is quite good, but be enough use any cokkie
(how %-12[$user] etc.) :)

ad "duplicate request header":
work OK only then, if file ioA.request.head.msg is blank :(

if include some text, so x-duplicate header (ioA.request.head.msg ) in .ioFTPD.message :(

malexx
03-29-2003, 02:39 PM
with 4.62 nuke dont work,dont know why,the setup seems to be OK,nuke dont work with trial or without.
Anyway i think 4.1 is the most stable Version all work with this version,in any other version,there are alway lot of thing that dont work for me,but dont know why!????:(

-=DoBBeR=-
03-29-2003, 03:11 PM
well 4.6.1r works great here with ioa 0.7.2+, so my qualified guess is that it's your lack of competence that keeps your server from working the way it should, sorry if I sound kind of harsh, but this is a typical RTFM problem :p

edit: typo

zpr
03-29-2003, 03:29 PM
io 462u and ioa 073 = working ok but 1 problem with site msg:

[21:18:57] SITE MSG user1 does it work?
[21:18:58] 200--[Message]-------------------------------------------------------
[21:18:58] 200- Message send to following user(s):
[21:18:58] 200- -----------------------------------------------------------[ioA]-
[21:18:58] 200 Command Successful.

notice that msg send to following user is blank :/

ofcoz user1 exists and he doesnt get any msg :(

nuke/unnuke are working fine

EDIT: SORRY FOR TROUBLE, PROBLEM SOLVED! IOA WORKS GREAT! :)

-=DoBBeR=-
03-29-2003, 03:37 PM
site msg testuser test
200--[Message]-------------------------------------------------------
200- Message send to following user(s):
200- testuser
200------------------------------------------------------------[ioA]-
200 Command Successful.

message was received also, must b something strange going on in your comp ;)

ls`
03-30-2003, 11:06 AM
hey, warc, good work so far, but we found a little bug in ioa:
nuking ain't working properly, the counting isn't OK.

200- user Bytes: 10MB Credit lost: 40MB

etc. this was supposed to be 2x. pls try to fix this one :)

+ you can add customized message output as soon as you have some time :)

keep it up and good luck :)

azert
03-30-2003, 11:17 AM
I have the same problem :(

-=DoBBeR=-
03-30-2003, 11:26 AM
site nuke test 2 test
200--[Nuke]----------------------------------------------------------
200- testuser Bytes: 4MB Credit lost: 19MB
200------------------------------------------------------------------
200- Total bytes: 4MB Total credits: 19MB
200------------------------------------------------------------[ioA]-
200 Command Successful.

same here I guess
ratio was 1:3

zpr
03-30-2003, 12:36 PM
hmm true, nuke count doesnt work well

same bug here

:(

WarC
03-30-2003, 02:48 PM
will take a look at it asap

WarC
03-30-2003, 04:17 PM
Oki tested now. Let me first note that I use the way glftpd nuke. Therefore not like raiden or any other server. So to point out that it does do it correct I paste both ioa and glftpd output below:

glftpd:
SITE NUKE Test 2 2
200- Nuke Completed.
200- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
200- Nukee(s): 1 Files: 3 Total bytes: 10,132,323
200- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
200- Nukee: warc Bytes: 9.7MB Credit Lost: 38.7MB
200- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

ioA output
SITE NUKE test 2 2
200--[Nuke]----------------------------------------------------------
200- master Bytes: 9MB Credit lost: 38MB
200------------------------------------------------------------------
200- Total bytes: 9MB Total credits: 38MB
200------------------------------------------------------------[ioA]-


Its actually same file that is being used. Note that the result is same so ioA does work.

R*iden counts: multi * ratio * mb
gl counts: mb*ratio + mb*(multi-1)
ioA counts as gl

NeoRanga
03-31-2003, 11:54 AM
Deleting missing files and incomplete tags seems to work fine with ioA rescan function, so if I install zipscript-c with symlinks rescan will delete symlink tag too??
Thx

WarC
03-31-2003, 05:46 PM
0.7.3 seems to have a bug with deleting symlinks and such but thats already sorted for next version

/WarC

HellsAngel
04-04-2003, 02:46 PM
Running 4.6.1r and latest ioa cant seem to get the announcements to work, previous versions worked great i use dzs.tcl for announcements added those specific log variables in ioa.cfg but sfv halfway and complete wont announce to name a few.

i got it now. zipsript doesnt like "/" anymore for path :(

-=DoBBeR=-
04-04-2003, 03:07 PM
thats not a problem with ioa, ioa has nothing to do with race output in chan..

iXi
04-07-2003, 12:45 PM
with the new ioa and dz 0.8.3 my accounces of
site nuke
site unnuke
site wipe
site pre

dont works fine...

example here:

•7:02PM• <XXX> -wipe DEFAULT- test@cRaCkeN wiped TV 1MB (0 files, SiTEOP dirs)

with ioa 0.7.0 it was:
•7:02PM• <XXX> -wipe TV- test@cRaCkeN wiped Family.Guy.S02E15.Stewie.macht.ernst.GERMAN.TVRip. DivX.READ.NFO-CaP 492MB (29 files, 2 dirs)

my configes are:

- dz.bot
VAR:
set variables(PRE) "%pf %user %group %files %mbytes"
ACCOUNCE:
set announce(PRE) "-%bold%group PRE%bold- wohooo!!! %bold%user%bold preed %bold%release%bold (%bold%mbytes%boldM in %bold%files%boldF)"

-ioa.0.7.2
Log_Wipe="%vfs" "%release" "%user" "%group" "%files" "%dirs" "%mb"

;( i want to get it back working...

thx cya

WarC
04-09-2003, 05:33 PM
are you sure you followed #8 in manual on how to replace loglines in ioa for dZ?

to my knowledge I havnt changed anything in logging so it should be the same.

Pichento
04-15-2003, 04:08 PM
Warc:

Nice with allotment in ioA 0.7.4 BUT could you please change it, so it supports groups as well. Pretty much useless without group support :)

Another thing: If you add quota - ioA will rock!

-=DoBBeR=-
04-15-2003, 04:42 PM
Originally posted by Pichento
Warc:

Nice with allotment in ioA 0.7.4 BUT could you please change it, so it supports groups as well. Pretty much useless without group support :)

Another thing: If you add quota - ioA will rock!

there are separate quotascripts, I know about at least two..

ProlyX
04-15-2003, 05:11 PM
which one? i only only one (this trial script where i must update winsck )

-=DoBBeR=-
04-15-2003, 05:29 PM
delphin on #ioftpd is also making one

ProlyX
04-15-2003, 05:31 PM
ah k but no public rls out yet or?

-=DoBBeR=-
04-15-2003, 05:33 PM
well I know he put out a dl link for it yesterday on #ioftpd, but I guess its a working beta

ProlyX
04-15-2003, 05:35 PM
k thnx i will conact him..

JRule
04-16-2003, 05:52 AM
set device(0) "C: hd-c"
set device(1) "D: hd-d"
set device(TOTAL) 2

What are these lines for in dZSbot.tcl I added al my harddisks to these lines, but I don't know if that's correct.

ProlyX
04-16-2003, 06:06 AM
you need only add the hdds that are you use in ioFTPD...
if you make !<sitename>free in your site chan it shows up freespace on these hdds...

Pichento
04-16-2003, 06:30 AM
anyone care to paste the dl link for the quota beta script here?

-=DoBBeR=-
04-16-2003, 08:43 AM
I'm not sure if delphin wants it public yet, why dont u just ask him for it on irc?

Pichento
04-16-2003, 01:38 PM
WarC:

PRE does no seem to work in 0.7.4.

says area is wrong even tho it aint..

-=DoBBeR=-
04-16-2003, 01:43 PM
works just fine here..

Sup3rm4n
05-01-2003, 04:56 AM
remember the ini is updated from 0.7.3 to 0.7.4!!

NeoRanga
05-02-2003, 08:10 AM
In 0.7.4 version rescan writes the results to the .ioFTPD.sfvdata file?? I see only files updates, it can be a feature in the next version for the releases that are in half way and need rescan function to process a file skipped by zipscript-c.
ThX.

DaemonEye
05-03-2003, 11:48 AM
I can not nuke, iam Master
----------
200--[Nuke]----------------------------------------------------------
200- You are not allowed to nuke other groups
200------------------------------------------------------------[ioA]-

But my Siteops can nuke everything, why?

-=DoBBeR=-
05-03-2003, 12:12 PM
Originally posted by DaemonEye
I can not nuke, iam Master
----------
200--[Nuke]----------------------------------------------------------
200- You are not allowed to nuke other groups
200------------------------------------------------------------[ioA]-

But my Siteops can nuke everything, why?

edit line for groupnuke flags in ioa.cfg........

DaemonEye
05-03-2003, 03:15 PM
my settings:

---------------------
Nuke_Splitter=
Nuke_Header=[Nuked]-%r
Nuke_Group_Flag=M
Nuke_Empty_Dir_Amount=25
Nuke_Message_File=.ioFTPD.message
Nuke_Create_MessageFile=1
UnNuke_Create_MessageFile=1
---------------------
is that not right?

-=DoBBeR=-
05-03-2003, 05:05 PM
Nuke_Group_Flag=M
does this sound like a normal groupadminflag to you?
Nuke_Group_Flag=G <--should be this...

DaemonEye
05-04-2003, 06:00 AM
cool, thx 4 help :)

WarC
05-04-2003, 04:46 PM
Originally posted by NeoRanga
In 0.7.4 version rescan writes the results to the .ioFTPD.sfvdata file?? I see only files updates, it can be a feature in the next version for the releases that are in half way and need rescan function to process a file skipped by zipscript-c.
ThX.


Hmm not really sure what you mean here but ioA rescan does not use any files except sfv file. .ioFTPD.sfvdata I have no idea what it contains.

/WarC

NeoRanga
05-05-2003, 06:06 AM
I mean that when you rescan an incomplete release and with some files not scanned by zipscript-c, ioA deletes the missing files but when the release get finished zipscript won't know that those files where rescaned and marked as completed by ioA, no?

MidKnight
05-14-2003, 10:52 AM
is it possible to change the way ioa creates the missings file

from > -missing
to> .missing

this would work much better with the SFV checker i have running on IOFTPD and also my manual checker if i need to use it. otherwise i end up with 2 "missing" type files

WarC
05-15-2003, 06:09 AM
why not change in zipscript to -missing :)

mapis
05-29-2003, 03:52 AM
anybody try 0.7.5?

im trying - i have problem! when i try anything with ioA, it broke account, which send request to server!

a read readme, and there is only "just replace EXE", and one new line in ioftpd.ini and one new sectio in ioA config...

anybody try this version? any idea about error?
0.7.4 whorks fine

iXi
05-29-2003, 04:11 AM
yepp new ioa ****s up accounts on nuke action and nuke flashfxp window msg is ****ed up too after nuke i have to restart io...

cya

Pichento
05-29-2003, 05:11 AM
BEWARE!

0.7.5. ****ed up my userdb. (6 users got removed from groups and ips deleted)

Also, doing sysop log and error log will **** up site completely.

WarC
05-29-2003, 07:26 AM
as I told you both(Pichento and prolucky) I need COMPLETE debuglogs to even start see what it can be. We(I and 3 others) tested this last night before release and didnt have any problem whatsoever with userstuff.

1. syslog never even uses userfiles.
2. Does they get deleted becaues io crash?
3. Do they get deleted even if io dont crash?
4. Does userfile gets deleted only or also from group/passd files?
5. Did you nuke while race or not?
6. I need more info. I have not succeded in recreate your issues. Need info on how it loock in flash after so called ****up.

/WarC

alturismo
05-29-2003, 08:48 AM
had teh same problem with damaged userfiles after nukes

after disabling ssl it seems to work, with ssl it crashes here

WarC
05-29-2003, 09:22 AM
me gives alturismo a kiss!

This was theeee clue that was needed. Since I dont use SSL when testing I couldnt recreate the issue. Now we located the problem. SSL + !buffer off in ioA creates this.

I have deactivated "!buffer off" and made a new version 0.7.6
"buffer off" is used to display text direcly and not after program is finished. rescanall on a dvd-r for instance.

http://warc.mine.nu/



/WarC

cdrips
06-01-2003, 06:05 PM
Hi, I was wondering in the new ioA when I try to do a site request, it comes back with the msg, command disabled. I'm using newest ioftpd 4.9 i think and have request = * in the ioftpd.ini. Anyway to fix this?

alturismo
06-02-2003, 12:08 AM
its disabled in latest versions, cause warc is working on an new

request.

should come back with new ioA release we all hope ;)

cdrips
06-02-2003, 12:49 AM
O good, I thought maybe it was just me doing something stupid again. Thank you warc =D.