PDA

View Full Version : any news bigstar?


Zapy_
03-16-2008, 06:47 AM
Cycled thru the forum and i cant find any real new posts so ill just start over.

How is the development going with flashsfv?
after using big-o's sfv and they just disaperd from the internet i have yet to find a great sfv creater/checker and found flashsfv after a fast look on inicoms site (before rebuilding it) when i actually was going to buy flashfxp after some years in .... well exile well say :)

anyway, both programs are great, if flashsfv had cost money i had nearly bought it to, if the bugs got fixed, but on the other hand bigstar would maybe feel more commitment if he got paid for it (yes i know the paypal account etc)

anyway, just wanted to stop by and here how its going, has the development stalled completley or is a new version on its way out?

i dont know how many of the bugs reported are fixed but heres another one.

right clicking on a folder and chosse create sfv file, flashsfv opens up and then crashes, im guessing its trying to create a sfv file for the folder not for the files in the folder.

the shell menu is then wrong if it shouldnt be able to create sfv files by-it-self opening the folder and create a sfv files for all the files being in the folder.

or its just a bug and it cant open the folder.

i hope this software just wont disapeer from the net because as for today its the best sfv checker for windows that i know of.

FTPServerTools
03-16-2008, 11:36 AM
Since it is freeware I gues it wouldnt hurt to say that there is a great plugin for totalcommander for creating/checking sfv files.....

Zapy_
03-16-2008, 11:40 AM
Since it is freeware I gues it wouldnt hurt to say that there is a great plugin for totalcommander for creating/checking sfv files.....

and what is it called?
can you associate the .sfv files with the plugin?

bigstar
03-16-2008, 12:16 PM
It's been quite a few months since I've worked on FlashSFV, with the last version I was under the impression that it was bug free.

I tested the latest version and creating SFV files from the right click menu seems to work just fine.

You can find the latest version at http://www.trvx.com/flashsfv/

Zapy_
03-16-2008, 12:42 PM
It's been quite a few months since I've worked on FlashSFV, with the last version I was under the impression that it was bug free.

I tested the latest version and creating SFV files from the right click menu seems to work just fine.

You can find the latest version at http://www.trvx.com/flashsfv/

im on the latests version, on vista x64 if i right click a folder and choose sfv create it opens and closes instantly.

bigstar
03-16-2008, 05:34 PM
It might be a limitation with 64bit since it is a 32bit program, although when you perform the right click command it's simply opening the program via the command line so it shouldn't be a factor.

I'm not really sure I have no way of testing vista x64.

Zapy_
03-16-2008, 05:38 PM
It might be a limitation with 64bit since it is a 32bit program, although when you perform the right click command it's simply opening the program via the command line so it shouldn't be a factor.

I'm not really sure I have no way of testing vista x64.

point where to search and ill search.

bigstar
03-16-2008, 06:49 PM
The command is FlashSFV.exe -makesfv "<path>"

You could try running it from windows command line..

Maybe verify the registry keys

HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Folder\shell\Create SFV\command
(defaullt) = "/path/to/FlashSFV.exe" -makesfv "%1"


The problem is fairly vague and because of that even I am not sure what to search for, I've looked myself and I haven't found anything.

Zapy_
03-17-2008, 05:05 PM
The command is FlashSFV.exe -makesfv "<path>"

You could try running it from windows command line..

Maybe verify the registry keys

HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Folder\shell\Create SFV\command
(defaullt) = "/path/to/FlashSFV.exe" -makesfv "%1"


The problem is fairly vague and because of that even I am not sure what to search for, I've looked myself and I haven't found anything.


iwe got folder->shell->explore and open no " Create SFV " under witch one should it be put?