*bump*
try'd specifing different port ranges for 129.x.x.1 and 129.x.x.2, didnt help either
[edit]
guys im starting to think this is an ioftpd bug rather than me doing something wrong or something else... i tried with fresh ioftpd install (ioFTPD-beta5-8-0r.zip & ioFTPD-beta5-8-5r-executable-only.zip) only changed the following in ioFTPD.ini:
Code:
[V1]
Host = 129.x.x.1
Ports = 63487-65535
Random = True
[V2]
Host = 129.x.x.2
Ports = 61439-63486
Random = True
Bind = 192.168.1.3
and under [FTP_Service]:
Code:
Device_Name = V1
Port = 6969
Code:
### Traffic Balancing ###
#
Data_Devices = V1 V2
Random_Devices = True
in Host.Rules:
in admin.vfs:
Code:
"c:\TEMP\ioFTPD\site" /
Logged into 129.x.x.1 and refreshed dirlisting few times (PASV, PASV, PASV etc etc ). logged in 2nd time and did the same. after 10-20x PASV it just "hangs" with a list error (see earlier post above). Also PASV on 129.x.x.2 always takes longer than on .1 (4 secs).
I tryed with several routers (Linksys, US Robotics) and i disabled all firewalls (software and hardware)/antivirus sw ... still the same. I'm really starting to think this is an ioFTPD thing...!
further info:
Windows 2000 SP4
3COM Etherlink XL 10/100 PCI NIC (3C905-TX) <- NAT
ND010 Ethernet/Fast Ethernet PCI Bus adaptor
please advice! darkone maybe?
[/edit]