View Single Post
Old 08-11-2004, 02:51 AM  
paddy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bigstar
When you enabled Alternative FXP did the direction of the PASV <> PORT commands reverse?
Yes, it did. But the response were the same.

Quote:
My thought was that profxp did things backwards compared to FlashFXP. My reason for this was because of the PASV reply. One reply ends with a period and the other doesn't. I took this as a sign of two different ftp servers returning the PASV reply.
Well.. it does something else, thats for sure. One difference is that FlashFXP is running behind a fw and profxp aint.. but my understanding of FXP is that my client doesnt bother about communication between the two servers ?

Quote:
One site allowing PORT and the other not allowing it.
Both support both PASV and PORT mode.. atleast for direct down-/up -loading.

Been trying a few different ftp-servers and from what I can get is the following:
  • proftpd <-> proftpd = no go
  • proftpd <-> raidenftpd = no go
  • proftpd <-> glftpd = no go
  • proftpd <-> vsftpd = no go
  • proftpd <-> g6ftpserver = works both ways
  • glftpd <-> glftpd = works both ways

I find this pretty strange ? What really amazes me is that the g6ftpserver worked .. becouse that one is aculy behind a fw seen from the proftpd's side..

I can setup a lab for you if you would like to debug something.. PM me in that case.
paddy is offline