FlashFXP Forums - View Single Post

Yil · 06-14-2011, 03:49 PM

I think you missed the odd thing that flash was doing in my bad pathname test. LIST -> STAT fine, and when stat returned a failure code flash re-issued the command using LIST. I presume that's a feature, BUT it used PORT/LIST when the site is setup for PASV/LIST. My guess is that the same code that fails over to PORT after 2(?) PASV list failures is kicking in or something. If it's supposed to failover to LIST after a STAT 5xx error it should honor the site's active/passive transfer rules.

06-14-2011, 03:49 PM
Yil Too much time... Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,194	I think you missed the odd thing that flash was doing in my bad pathname test. LIST -> STAT fine, and when stat returned a failure code flash re-issued the command using LIST. I presume that's a feature, BUT it used PORT/LIST when the site is setup for PASV/LIST. My guess is that the same code that fails over to PORT after 2(?) PASV list failures is kicking in or something. If it's supposed to failover to LIST after a STAT 5xx error it should honor the site's active/passive transfer rules.