[loopex]

yes, you know what you are talking about, thats good.. you must be a security expert?
you told me in another thread that there are no backdoor, right?

for ex. if the original non encrypted sites.dat doesnt get wiped with pseudorandom data
several times after the pwd are set, then i have found a security hole, to reveal the
sites & password within a short time... allright, not a backdoor.. but very close..

do you really know how windows dump memory continuously? if you did then you would understand..
here i ask a couple of question, bcoz i cant find the answer in help.chm or search..

if there is way to make flashfxp more secure, why not do it?
if there is any? why leave security hole's open?

if me or someone else can help Author to find a couple of more security feature for bigstar
to implement, then i cant se anything wrong with it? do you?

thing is; its not about me, their are so many user of flashfxp out there and im sure they would
like a bulletproof encryption/decrytion with no security holes in it.

Author did implement this symmetric block cipher for a reason?
and it was Not bcoz flashfxp user should be switching over to 'keeypass.info' instead of FFXP for secure sites/pwd storage


Thanks